Principality of Sancratosia

Treaty Sancratosia-Vishwamitra

Treaty Sancratosia-Vishwamitra

Treaty between the Principality of Sancratosia and the State of Vishwamitra

The Principality of Sancratosia and the State of Vishwamitra, hereafter called “the parties”, in accordance with the principles of international law;

Agree to the following :

Preamble

Be it known that the parties, acting on behalf of their nations through peaceful dialogue and diplomacy; hereby formally declare each other’s recognition as sovereign entities, and as a basement for such decision, deliberate:

To conclude the mutual recognition treaty consisting of the following points, as proof of a good will existing between the State of Vishwamitra and the Principality of Sancratosia. It is the obligation of nations in the signature of a treaty to follow these regulations and procedures and for the leaders of the state to pursue peace and understanding of both nations.

Article 1.

The State of Vishwamitra and the Principality of Sancratosia, as signatory parties, mutually recognize their existence as legal and constitutional nations with full sovereignty, freedom and independence.

Article 2.

The signatory parties agree to mutually recognize and respect their symbols, territories, institutions and legal systems, as well as the legitimacy of their institutions, authorities, laws, nobilities, decorations, order of precedence, etc. For this reason, they undertake not to intervene in their respective internal affairs or in the decisions made by their institutions.

Article 3.

Both parties are free to establish relations and sign treaties and/or agreements with other nations and/or inter-(micro)national entities, without this binding the other party.

Article 4.

It is through this mutual recognition that both parties establish formal diplomatic relations in conformity with their respective constitutions and documents without contradiction; and both nations express their willingness to continue their diplomatic contacts and to continue advancing in relations of friendship and mutual collaboration as a means of development and strengthening of their citizens and institutions and, consequently, of the micronational sphere in general, maintaining for this a permanent communication channel.

Article 5.

The signing parties undertake to resolve their conflicts and divergences in dialogue and through diplomatic channels. Furthermore, they undertake that, in the event that one of the signatory parties declares war on another nation, this Treaty will be reviewed and it will be evaluated whether to continue with its validation or not.

Article 6.

The parties have agreed to develop their friendly relations of co-operation in respect to the principles of mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other’s internal affairs; unless formally asked, and peaceful coexistence.

Article 7.

The parties formally agree to help each other push off any form of forced foreign, third-party influence that may pose threat to the social, cultural and/or economical integrity of any of the two aforementioned parties.

Article 8.

Both signatories mutually agree to make public the signing of this Treaty for the knowledge of their own citizens and their respective diplomatic circles, incorporating the corresponding information on their respective official channels.

Article 9.

This Treaty will be ratified, in accordance with the Institutional procedure of each one of the signatories and will enter into force as of the day of its signature, each signing party committing to give it the maximum publicity in its territory. Once this treaty has been ratified, it will remain in force without time limitation, as long as it is not denounced in writing by one of the signatory parties. If there is demonstrated inactivity and without prior notice on the part of one of the signatory parties for a period greater than six months, this Treaty is to be considered null and void.

Article 10.

In such case that the other party is subject to unconstitutional, or generally unlawful claims upon its governance, country, or the likes of it as interpreted in dialogue between both parties; the other party shall not recognize such and will refrain or re-evaluate diplomatic ties with the aggressing third party as interpreted by aforementioned means.

Given in Our Princely Palace in Sancratosia on two March two thousand twenty-two.

Cloe